DECOMPRESSIVE SURGERY IN CEREBRAL VENOUS SINUS THROMBOSIS WITH VACCINE-INDUCED IMMUNE THROMBOTIC THROMBOCYTOPENIA

Background and aims: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (CVST-TTS) is a serious adverse drug reaction after adenoviral SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. CVST-TTS patients may need decompressive surgery to avoid fatal brain herniation, but despite this intervention, many CVST-TTS patients die during the initial hospital admission. Here, we describe the characteristics and outcomes of CVST-TTS patients who underwent decompressive surgery and explore predictors of mortality in CVST-TTS patients. Methods: We used data from an ongoing international registry collecting data from patients who developed CVST within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, reported between 29 March and 9 December 2021. TTS was defined in accordance with the Brighton Collaboration case definition. Results: Out of 97 CVST-TTS patients, 29 (30%) underwent decompressive surgery. All operated patients had an intracerebral haemorrhage before the surgery. In-hospital mortality was 19/29 (66%) in the operated and 23/68 (34%) in the non-operated group. In the operated group, the highest mortality rate was among patients who were in coma before the surgery (14/15, 93% vs 4/12, 33% in those not in coma), had bilateral absence of the pupillary response (7/7, 100% vs 8/16, 50% in patients with uni/bilateral pupillary response) and platelet count <50 x103/μL (11/14, 79% vs 6/12, 50% in cases with a platelet count ≥50 x103/μL). Conclusion: Mortality rate of CVST-TTS patients who underwent decompressive surgery is extremely high. Among the operated patients, coma before the surgery, bilateral absence of the pupillary response, and platelet count <50 x103/μL were the predictors of mortality.

Stroke network performance during COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis

Background and Aims: The effect of the COVID pandemic on stroke networks performance are unclear, particularly with consideration of drip & ship versus mothership models. We systematically reviewed and metaanalyzed variations in stroke admissions, rate and timing of reperfusion treatments during the COVID pandemic versus the prepandemic timeframe. Methods: The systematic review followed registered protocol (PROSPERO-CRD42020211535), PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL until 9/10/ 2020, for studies reporting variations in ischemic stroke admissions, treatment rates and timing in COVID vs control-period. Primary outcome was the weekly admission incidence rate ratio (IRR=admissions during COVID-period/admissions during control-period). Secondary outcomes were (i) changes in rate of patients undergoing reperfusion treatment and (ii) time metrics for pre-and in-hospital phase. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included in qualitative synthesis, with 212960 patients observed for 532 cumulative weeks (325 control-period, 207 COVID-period). COVID-period was associated with a significant reduction in stroke admission rates (IRR=0.69, 95%CI, 0.61-0.79) and a higher relative presentation with large vessel occlusion stroke (RR=1.62, 95%CI, 1.24-2.12). Proportions of patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis remained unchanged, while endovascular treatment increased (RR=1.14, 95%CI, 1.02-1.28). Onset-to-door time was longer for drip&ship compared to mothership model (+32 minutes vs-12 minutes, pmeta-regression =.03). Conclusions: Despite a 35% drop in stroke admissions during the pandemic, proportions of patients receiving reperfusion and time-metrics were not inferior to control-period, justifying allocation of resources to keep stroke networks up and running.